Crypto-backed loans in 2026: dated rates and LTV limits from Aave, Coinbase, Nexo, Ledn and SALT, CeFi vs DeFi, how to choose a lender, liquidation maths and the risks.

Last updated: 4 October 2026
Crypto-backed loans let you borrow cash, stablecoins or another token against crypto you already hold, without selling it. You post collateral, draw a loan against a fraction of its value, and get the collateral back when you repay. This guide covers how crypto-backed loans work, what they cost in 2026, the three numbers that decide whether you get liquidated, the difference between CeFi and DeFi lenders, how to choose one, and where you can actually take one out today.
The short version: a crypto-backed loan is always over-collateralised. In October 2026 you can typically borrow 30–80% of your collateral's value depending on the asset and lender, at rates from roughly 2–5% a year on large DeFi money markets to 7–12% at many CeFi lenders, and you lose some or all of the collateral if its value drops far enough that the loan is no longer covered. No credit check is involved because the collateral is the guarantee.
A crypto-backed loan (also called a crypto collateral loan or crypto-secured loan) is a loan secured by digital assets. You lock collateral — tokens, stablecoins, liquid staking tokens or NFTs — and in return you receive a loan in another asset. As long as you repay the loan plus interest and your collateral keeps its value, you get the collateral back untouched. Nothing is sold and your position stays intact.
That is the whole difference from selling. Selling exits the position permanently and, in many jurisdictions, triggers a taxable disposal. Borrowing keeps ownership and simply turns an asset you do not want to give up into spendable liquidity.
Because crypto is volatile, virtually every crypto loan is over-collateralised: the collateral is worth more than the amount borrowed. To borrow $1,000 you might lock $2,000 or more. That buffer protects the lender against price swings, and it is also why crypto lending can be permissionless. The collateral is the guarantee; your credit score, income and identity are irrelevant to the contract. (Loans that skip collateral entirely are a different product; see crypto loans without collateral.)
LTV is your loan as a percentage of your collateral's value:
LTV = (loan amount ÷ collateral value) × 100
Example: you own an NFT with a floor value of 3 EGLD and borrow the maximum allowed, 50% LTV, which is 1.5 EGLD. If the collateral rises, your effective LTV falls and you gain breathing room. If it drops, your LTV climbs toward the danger zone. Lower LTV means a safer loan; higher LTV extracts more capital per unit of collateral but leaves far less room for error, which is the same trade-off as any form of leverage in crypto. For a deeper walkthrough of the arithmetic, see crypto loan LTV explained.
The liquidation threshold is the LTV at which the lender is allowed to sell your collateral. It always sits above the maximum LTV you can borrow at, which is your cushion. Many protocols express the distance to that line as a Health Factor:
Health Factor = (collateral value × liquidation threshold) ÷ debt including interest
Above 1.0 you are safe; at 1.0 the position becomes liquidatable. On JewelSwap's NFT loans, for instance, the liquidation threshold is 90%, positions with a Health Factor of 1.5 or more are shown as green, 1.0–1.5 as orange (monitor closely), and below 1.0 as red. You can improve a Health Factor at any time by repaying part of the loan or adding collateral. Managing it actively is the one real discipline of borrowing against crypto.
Worked example. You deposit ETH worth $10,000 on Aave v3 Ethereum, where WETH's liquidation threshold was 83% on 4 October 2026, and borrow $5,000 USDC. Your Health Factor is 10,000 × 0.83 ÷ 5,000 = 1.66. The position becomes liquidatable when the collateral is worth 5,000 ÷ 0.83 ≈ $6,024, a fall of about 40%. Borrow $7,000 instead and the same maths gives a liquidation point only about 16% below today's price.
Crypto loans are priced in one of two ways:
Always work out what a plan costs on an annualised basis before you compare it with a variable-rate market (our APY vs APR explainer shows how), and confirm whether interest is deducted upfront, accrued, or due at each period end.
The table below shows published terms from a cross-section of lenders. DeFi figures were read from the Aave v3 Ethereum pool contract on 4 October 2026; CeFi figures come from each lender's own site or from CoinLedger's lender comparison (updated 22 September 2026). Rates change daily in DeFi and by tier and jurisdiction in CeFi, so treat them as a snapshot, not a quote.
| Lender | Model | Borrow rate | Max LTV | Liquidation | Source (date) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aave v3 (Ethereum) | DeFi, variable | USDC/USDT about 4.4% APR | WETH 80.5%, WBTC 73%, wstETH 78.5% | WETH 83%, WBTC 78%, wstETH 81% | On-chain pool data (4 Oct 2026) |
| Coinbase | Exchange front-end to on-chain loans | About 5% APR | About 75% at origination | 86% | CoinLedger (22 Sep 2026) |
| Nexo | CeFi credit line | From 1.9% a year (best tier) | BTC/ETH 50%, USDT/USDC 90% | Not published on borrow page | Nexo (4 Oct 2026) |
| Ledn | CeFi term loan | 9.25% (over $2M) to 11.49% (under $250k) APR | 50% | 80% | CoinLedger (22 Sep 2026) |
| SALT Lending | CeFi term loan (1, 3 or 5 years) | From 7.49% APR (1-year, 30% LTV) | 30%, 50% or 70% | Per loan terms | SALT (4 Oct 2026) |
| Crypto.com | CeFi | About 6% at 33% LTV | 50% | Not published | CoinLedger (22 Sep 2026) |
Two patterns stand out. First, headline rates are not comparable on their own: Nexo's 1.9% is a best-tier figure, SALT's 7.49% assumes a low 30% LTV, and CeFi APRs generally rise as LTV rises. Second, DeFi money markets currently offer both higher LTVs on blue chips and lower stablecoin borrowing costs than most CeFi lenders, but you carry the monitoring and smart-contract risk yourself.
There is no single "crypto loan rate". What you pay depends on the collateral, the venue and how crowded the pool is:
The rate is only half the cost. Liquidation penalties come out of your collateral if a position goes wrong: on Aave v3 Ethereum the liquidation bonus paid to liquidators was 5% for WBTC, 6% for wstETH and 7.5% for cbBTC on 4 October 2026. Add swap slippage when collateral is sold, and gas fees for every top-up or repayment.
With a CeFi lender you hand your collateral to a company that custodies it and issues the loan. The experience feels familiar, but it introduces counterparty risk: you are trusting a business to safeguard your assets, stay solvent and give them back. The last cycle showed how badly that can go when centralised lenders froze withdrawals or collapsed with user funds inside. In CeFi, your keys become their keys.
In DeFi the loan is executed by smart contracts. Collateral is locked in code, not held by a company. LTV caps, interest rates and liquidation logic are enforced automatically and are auditable on-chain. You interact from your own non-custodial wallet, and no company can freeze your account or lose your deposit to its own bad bets. The trade-off is that you carry the responsibility for monitoring the position and understanding the protocol. For the full comparison, read CeFi vs DeFi.
| CeFi lender | DeFi money market | |
|---|---|---|
| Who holds the collateral | The company (custodial) | A smart contract; you keep the keys to your wallet |
| Identity checks | KYC required | None at protocol level |
| Loan currency | Fiat or stablecoins | Stablecoins and tokens; fiat needs an off-ramp |
| Rates | Fixed per term or tier | Variable, set by utilisation |
| Margin calls | Usually notified before liquidation | Automatic liquidation at the threshold; no warning unless you set one up |
| Main failure mode | Company insolvency or frozen withdrawals | Smart-contract bugs, oracle failures, fast liquidations |
The venues below are the main models you will encounter. What each is best for differs more than their marketing suggests. TVL figures are from DefiLlama on 4 October 2026.
For a side-by-side of the DeFi options, see best DeFi lending platforms in 2026. If your question is which of your assets you can borrow against and how much each supports, that is covered in borrow against crypto without selling: which assets and how much.
This page is about crypto-backed loans in general. If you arrived here wanting to borrow against Uniswap specifically, the short answers are below, and two dedicated guides go further: borrowing against LP tokens for liquidity positions, and Ethereum-backed loans for ETH-side collateral.
Holding UNI does not automatically mean you can borrow against it. On Aave v3 on Ethereum, UNI has a loan-to-value of 0 (confirmed from the pool contract on 4 October 2026): you can supply it and earn interest, but it gives you no borrowing power there. Governance can set an asset's LTV to zero when it judges the token too thin or too volatile to lend against safely. Compound v3 does accept UNI, at a 68% collateral factor (DefiLlama, 20 September 2026). The general lesson applies to any mid-cap token: which venue you pick decides whether your collateral works at all.
A Uniswap v3 liquidity position is an ERC-721 NFT describing a price range, not a token balance, so most money markets will not accept it. Specialised lenders do: Revert Lend accepts Uniswap v3 positions as collateral and held about $6.4 million across Ethereum, Base and Arbitrum on 4 October 2026 (DefiLlama). LP collateral is harder to underwrite because its value is computed from pool state, its composition drifts toward whichever asset is falling (our concentrated liquidity explainer works through that arithmetic), and a liquidator must unwind it before it can be sold, which is why lenders apply conservative LTVs. Uniswap v4 keeps positions inside a single pool-manager contract rather than one NFT per position, so v3-era tooling does not carry over unchanged.
JewelSwap is a non-custodial, multi-chain DeFi protocol on MultiversX, Sui and Radix. You borrow directly from your own wallet, and no company ever takes custody of your assets.
Deposit an NFT from a verified collection and borrow up to 50% of its value in EGLD, funded by a shared lending pool rather than a counterparty you have to negotiate with. The worked example from the documentation:
You deposit an NFT with a 3 EGLD floor and open a 1.5 EGLD loan on the 16-day plan at 4%. After 16 days you either repay 1.5 EGLD plus 0.06 EGLD interest and get the NFT back, or pay just the 0.06 EGLD interest to keep the loan running for another 16 days.
Liquidation is not a hair-trigger. If the Health Factor falls below 1.0 or an interest payment is missed, the loan moves into a 48-hour grace period during which you can still redeem the NFT by paying the debt, outstanding interest and a 10% liquidation fee on the borrowed amount. Only after that window does the NFT go to auction on XOXNO. Risk caps apply: at most 20 EGLD can be borrowed per NFT, each collection can draw at most 20% of the pool's reserves, and a single wallet at most 5%. Floor prices drive the valuation, so it helps to understand how an NFT floor price is set.
For token collateral, JewelSwap built money markets with both isolated markets (risk ring-fenced to one asset pair) and global cross markets (borrow against a basket of collateral), priced from Pyth and Umbrella oracles plus AshSwap and xExchange safe-price feeds so that no single source can trigger an unfair liquidation. Supply and borrowing in the MultiversX money markets are paused at the time of writing; existing borrowers can still repay. Do not plan a new loan around them until the pause is lifted.
The practical rule: borrow well below the maximum LTV, watch the Health Factor, and keep a repayment or top-up plan ready before the market forces one on you. DeFi liquidations explained walks through what actually happens when a position is closed.
It depends on the collateral and lender. Stablecoins and blue-chip tokens support the highest LTVs, volatile tokens less, and NFTs the least. On 4 October 2026 Aave v3 Ethereum allowed 80.5% against WETH and 73% against WBTC, Nexo listed 50% for BTC and ETH, and JewelSwap's verified NFTs support up to 50% of their value in EGLD, capped at 20 EGLD per NFT.
On 4 October 2026, borrowing USDC on Aave v3 Ethereum cost about 4.4% APR (variable). CeFi lenders ranged from Nexo's best-tier 1.9% to around 5% at Coinbase, 7.49% and up at SALT and 9.25–11.49% at Ledn, depending on LTV, loan size and tier.
No. The loan is secured entirely by the collateral, so lenders — and smart contracts in particular — do not assess your creditworthiness. CeFi lenders will still run KYC on your identity.
In many jurisdictions borrowing is not a taxable event, unlike selling. Liquidations may be treated as a disposal. Rules vary widely, so check with a professional in your country.
Your LTV rises and your Health Factor falls. Below the liquidation threshold the position can be closed and collateral sold to cover the debt, usually with a liquidation penalty. On JewelSwap's NFT loans you get a 48-hour grace period to redeem before the NFT is auctioned.
There is no universal number, but many borrowers keep LTV at roughly half of the venue's liquidation threshold or below, which for blue-chip collateral means surviving a 40% or larger price drop. The closer you borrow to the maximum, the smaller the move that liquidates you.
It depends entirely on the venue. On Aave v3 on Ethereum, UNI has a loan-to-value of 0, so it cannot be used as collateral there at all (pool data, 4 October 2026); Compound v3 accepts it at a 68% collateral factor. Uniswap v3 LP positions are ERC-721 NFTs and only specialised lenders such as Revert Lend accept them. Check the live parameters of the specific market before depositing.
They fail differently. DeFi removes the counterparty but adds smart-contract risk and puts position management on you. CeFi removes the operational burden but means trusting a company with your collateral.